Genuine Mediums – How Important in an Open Mind When Doing Psychic Research?

Genuine mediums……do they exist, or not?  And how important is it to be open minded when it comes to testing a psychic, or a medium for accuracy?  It sounds like it should be pretty simple to answer that correctly, but the simple truth is that MOST people who investigate psychic phenomena actually go in with a pretty significant “bias” before they begin!

Now I’m a believer….and many of you already know that.  Because I want to believe?  Probably….yes..:-)  But more importantly than that – becuase my EXPERIENCE with genuine psychic phenomena has proven to me that there ARE genuine mediums who truly do what they purport to do – communicate with our loved one’s on the “other side”.  And as hard as that is to accept for many skeptics, it’s actually the BEST explanation of what happens when you call, see or work with a real psychic. 

Far too many skeptics dismiss everything as fraud.  Or a good guess.  Or luck.  Or won’t even acknowledge some of the better evidence that exists at all.  Why?  Because they’re world view says it’s impossible…..BEFORE they even begin the investigation.

Here is a short blurb from the Unexplained Mysteries blog on skepticism, and the experience of seeing a real medium in person.  (and the various dogmas that lead many to believe it’s all fake…regardless of what they see)  Check out the full story at the link below! (or check out our most recommended psychic phone service and make up your OWN mind instead!)

An open mind is the most important part in any investigation, and is no place for those with the diseases of closed mindedness or entrenched scepticism. Next was Doris Stokes a while before she came famous, it was felt there was no way she could have known the things she said, while the scientific test was not perfect, it never is-she did describe in detail, several dead relatives to the judges, and gave various mannerisms and birthdays, I could see the panel were very sceptical, when they should have been impartial, yet they were silently impressed.

This was the same well spoken Evangelical man, who led the hate campaign, as soon as Doris had died, in saying she was fake, his church has made the same claim about Derek Acorah and now James Van Pragh.

Now I have never seen Derek or James at work, but I was there when Doris told publisher Robert Maxwell intimate details over the dinner table of how he would die, and this proved absolutely right in every respect, and while Doris and i disagreed on specifics of spirit contact and much else, i still believe she was genuine. It was unfortunate in the tests that I saw, that no real paranormal experts were present, a couple of psychologists tried to dominate the panel, but you cannot use the knowledge gained in psychology for assessing psychic ability, it is the wrong tool for the job.

Unexplained Mysteries – Genuine or fake – medium Doris Stokes ?